Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96176 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity Of Show cause notice - The case pertains to a dealer of woven fabrics and readymade garments challenging a tax demand order due to allegedly insufficient opportunity to contest. Despite delay in response to a show cause notice, subsequent communication and evidence submission by the petitioner suggest efforts to refute discrepancies and comply with requirements. The Government maintains adherence to procedural fairness but acknowledges the petitioner's subsequent explanations for discrepancies. The High Court intervenes, quashing the order subject to conditions ensuring procedural fairness and opportunity for the petitioner to address the tax demand.
Validity Of Show cause notice - The case pertains to a dealer of woven fabrics and readymade garments challenging a tax demand order due to allegedly insufficient opportunity to contest. Despite delay in response to a show cause notice, subsequent communication and evidence submission by the petitioner suggest efforts to refute discrepancies and comply with requirements. The Government maintains adherence to procedural fairness but acknowledges the petitioner's subsequent explanations for discrepancies. The High Court intervenes, quashing the order subject to conditions ensuring procedural fairness and opportunity for the petitioner to address the tax demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
