Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Validity of Tax demand - Non consideration of reply submitted by the petitioner / assessee - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's contentions. It quashed the impugned orders and directed the respondent to appropriate 10% of the disputed tax demand from the petitioner's bank account. Additionally, the petitioner was granted three weeks to submit a reply to the show cause notice, and upon satisfaction of the payment and receipt of the reply, the Assessing Officer was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity for further proceedings and issue fresh orders within two months.
Validity of Tax demand - Non consideration of reply submitted by the petitioner / assessee - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's contentions. It quashed the impugned orders and directed the respondent to appropriate 10% of the disputed tax demand from the petitioner's bank account. Additionally, the petitioner was granted three weeks to submit a reply to the show cause notice, and upon satisfaction of the payment and receipt of the reply, the Assessing Officer was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity for further proceedings and issue fresh orders within two months.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
