Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1061 to 1080 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of Tax demand - Non consideration of reply submitted by the petitioner / assessee - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's contentions. It quashed the impugned orders and directed the respondent to appropriate 10% of the disputed tax demand from the petitioner's bank account. Additionally, the petitioner was granted three weeks to submit a reply to the show cause notice, and upon satisfaction of the payment and receipt of the reply, the Assessing Officer was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity for further proceedings and issue fresh orders within two months.
Validity of Tax demand - Non consideration of reply submitted by the petitioner / assessee - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's contentions. It quashed the impugned orders and directed the respondent to appropriate 10% of the disputed tax demand from the petitioner's bank account. Additionally, the petitioner was granted three weeks to submit a reply to the show cause notice, and upon satisfaction of the payment and receipt of the reply, the Assessing Officer was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity for further proceedings and issue fresh orders within two months.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
