Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Violation of Principles of natural justice - The High Court, upon examining the petition, found that the order-in-original passed by the Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Belapur, was in breach of the principles of natural justice. It noted discrepancies in the scheduling of personal hearings and the delayed service of the order on the petitioner. Considering these factors, the High Court quashed the impugned order and remanded the proceedings to the respondent for fresh orders.
Violation of Principles of natural justice - The High Court, upon examining the petition, found that the order-in-original passed by the Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Belapur, was in breach of the principles of natural justice. It noted discrepancies in the scheduling of personal hearings and the delayed service of the order on the petitioner. Considering these factors, the High Court quashed the impugned order and remanded the proceedings to the respondent for fresh orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
