Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Seeking refund of amount deposited - department coerced to deposit the tax amounts - The High court found the petitioner's claim of coercion unsubstantiated, highlighting evidence of voluntary payment and the petitioner's failure to raise complaints regarding coercion. The court emphasized that determining coercion versus voluntary payment involves disputed factual questions beyond the scope of writ proceedings. It asserted that such determinations require extensive evidence analysis, akin to civil suits, which cannot be conducted in summary proceedings under Article 226.
Seeking refund of amount deposited - department coerced to deposit the tax amounts - The High court found the petitioner's claim of coercion unsubstantiated, highlighting evidence of voluntary payment and the petitioner's failure to raise complaints regarding coercion. The court emphasized that determining coercion versus voluntary payment involves disputed factual questions beyond the scope of writ proceedings. It asserted that such determinations require extensive evidence analysis, akin to civil suits, which cannot be conducted in summary proceedings under Article 226.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
