Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1481 to 1500 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of reopening of assessment - clandestine and unaccounted sales - The High Court reviewed a petition challenging the rejection of objections to a notice for reassessment under the Income Tax Act. The petitioner argued that the reassessment was based on a change of opinion rather than a mistake. The court examined the assessment procedure and found that the reasons for reopening the assessment did not indicate the discovery of new material but rather a potential change of opinion. - Consequently, the court quashed the impugned order and notice, ruling in favor of the petitioner.
Validity of reopening of assessment - clandestine and unaccounted sales - The High Court reviewed a petition challenging the rejection of objections to a notice for reassessment under the Income Tax Act. The petitioner argued that the reassessment was based on a change of opinion rather than a mistake. The court examined the assessment procedure and found that the reasons for reopening the assessment did not indicate the discovery of new material but rather a potential change of opinion. - Consequently, the court quashed the impugned order and notice, ruling in favor of the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
