Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 - The Tribunal concluded that the assessing officer had conducted a reasonable inquiry into the relevant issues, and the assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Despite the discrepancy between the intended scrutiny and the actual assessment, the Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the application of Instruction No. 9/2007, stating its inapplicability to the case at hand. - In light of the findings, the High Court dismissed the appeal, as it found no question of law arising from the impugned order.
Revision u/s 263 - The Tribunal concluded that the assessing officer had conducted a reasonable inquiry into the relevant issues, and the assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Despite the discrepancy between the intended scrutiny and the actual assessment, the Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the application of Instruction No. 9/2007, stating its inapplicability to the case at hand. - In light of the findings, the High Court dismissed the appeal, as it found no question of law arising from the impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.