Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained ...
Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involved challenges to the disallowance of expenses on repairs and maintenance and a donation to a trust. The appellant argued that both expenses were incurred for business purposes and should be allowed as deductions. The opponents contended that the expenses were not wholly and exclusively for business and should be disallowed. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues, finding the expenses to be revenue in nature and made for commercial expediency. The High Court dismissed the appeal on the repairs and maintenance issue but admitted the appeal on the donation to the trust, indicating a need for further consideration.
The case involved challenges to the disallowance of expenses on repairs and maintenance and a donation to a trust. The appellant argued that both expenses were incurred for business purposes and should be allowed as deductions. The opponents contended that the expenses were not wholly and exclusively for business and should be disallowed. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues, finding the expenses to be revenue in nature and made for commercial expediency. The High Court dismissed the appeal on the repairs and maintenance issue but admitted the appeal on the donation to the trust, indicating a need for further consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.