Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Income taxable in India or not - Taxation of Technical Collaboration Fees @ 10% u/s. 9(1)(vii) r.w.s 115A(1)(b) - The Appellate Tribunal considered the arguments presented by both parties and examined relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act and the India-Mauritius tax treaty. It noted that the assessee, being a foreign company, did not have a permanent establishment (PE) in India. Additionally, there was no specific clause in the tax treaty addressing the taxability of the income in question. - ITAT held that in the absence of a permanent establishment and specific treaty provisions, the income should be treated as business profits and is not taxable in India.
Income taxable in India or not - Taxation of Technical Collaboration Fees @ 10% u/s. 9(1)(vii) r.w.s 115A(1)(b) - The Appellate Tribunal considered the arguments presented by both parties and examined relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act and the India-Mauritius tax treaty. It noted that the assessee, being a foreign company, did not have a permanent establishment (PE) in India. Additionally, there was no specific clause in the tax treaty addressing the taxability of the income in question. - ITAT held that in the absence of a permanent establishment and specific treaty provisions, the income should be treated as business profits and is not taxable in India.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
