Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153C/143(3) against Settlement Commission order - The Tribunal found the reassessment to infringe upon the principles laid out by the ITSC, which had already settled the income at 8% of the receipts from the water pipeline project. The reassessment was deemed impermissible in law, rendering the impugned order dated 30.12.2019 passed u/s 153C/153A/143(3) as invalid. Consequently, all additions made therein were deleted.
Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153C/143(3) against Settlement Commission order - The Tribunal found the reassessment to infringe upon the principles laid out by the ITSC, which had already settled the income at 8% of the receipts from the water pipeline project. The reassessment was deemed impermissible in law, rendering the impugned order dated 30.12.2019 passed u/s 153C/153A/143(3) as invalid. Consequently, all additions made therein were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.