Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1721 to 1740 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Estimation of income - bogus purchases - The Tribunal addressed various issues, including the validity of the reopening of assessment, the genuineness of purchases, calculation of the profit element, and determination of the gross profit rate. It found that the purchases were reconciled with sales, indicating their genuineness. Relying on judicial precedents, the Tribunal concluded that only the profit element of the alleged bogus purchases should be assessed. It accepted the industry-standard gross profit rate of 3% for diamond trading and modified the CIT(A)'s order accordingly, restricting the addition to the profit element.
Estimation of income - bogus purchases - The Tribunal addressed various issues, including the validity of the reopening of assessment, the genuineness of purchases, calculation of the profit element, and determination of the gross profit rate. It found that the purchases were reconciled with sales, indicating their genuineness. Relying on judicial precedents, the Tribunal concluded that only the profit element of the alleged bogus purchases should be assessed. It accepted the industry-standard gross profit rate of 3% for diamond trading and modified the CIT(A)'s order accordingly, restricting the addition to the profit element.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.