Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Classification of exported goods - Abrasive Mesh - The Tribunal observed that the lower authorities failed to address the Appellant's submissions adequately. Specifically, they did not justify the denial of the Appellant's requests for retesting the sample or for cross-examining the Chemical Examiner. Moreover, they did not provide reasons for the non-disclosure of communications from the relevant entity. Emphasizing the technical nature of the goods' properties and the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice, the Tribunal remanded the case for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.
Classification of exported goods - Abrasive Mesh - The Tribunal observed that the lower authorities failed to address the Appellant's submissions adequately. Specifically, they did not justify the denial of the Appellant's requests for retesting the sample or for cross-examining the Chemical Examiner. Moreover, they did not provide reasons for the non-disclosure of communications from the relevant entity. Emphasizing the technical nature of the goods' properties and the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice, the Tribunal remanded the case for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.