Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Recovery proceedings by SEBI - Maintainability of provisions of IBC over the provisions of the SEBI Act - The High Court affirmed the decision of the Single Judge, stating that no moratorium was in force during the relevant period. Thus, SEBI's issuance of the impugned certificate was justified. It held that the provisions of IBC do not override SEBI regulations, particularly in cases where no moratorium exists. The High Court did not delve into the question of whether the levy by SEBI constituted a fine or a penalty, leaving it open for consideration in future proceedings. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.
Recovery proceedings by SEBI - Maintainability of provisions of IBC over the provisions of the SEBI Act - The High Court affirmed the decision of the Single Judge, stating that no moratorium was in force during the relevant period. Thus, SEBI's issuance of the impugned certificate was justified. It held that the provisions of IBC do not override SEBI regulations, particularly in cases where no moratorium exists. The High Court did not delve into the question of whether the levy by SEBI constituted a fine or a penalty, leaving it open for consideration in future proceedings. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
