Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Centralised assessment transfer becomes unwarranted once the searched person's assessment is complete, requiring restoration to the appropriate charge...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Recovery proceedings by SEBI - Maintainability of provisions of IBC over the provisions of the SEBI Act - The High Court affirmed the decision of the Single Judge, stating that no moratorium was in force during the relevant period. Thus, SEBI's issuance of the impugned certificate was justified. It held that the provisions of IBC do not override SEBI regulations, particularly in cases where no moratorium exists. The High Court did not delve into the question of whether the levy by SEBI constituted a fine or a penalty, leaving it open for consideration in future proceedings. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.
Recovery proceedings by SEBI - Maintainability of provisions of IBC over the provisions of the SEBI Act - The High Court affirmed the decision of the Single Judge, stating that no moratorium was in force during the relevant period. Thus, SEBI's issuance of the impugned certificate was justified. It held that the provisions of IBC do not override SEBI regulations, particularly in cases where no moratorium exists. The High Court did not delve into the question of whether the levy by SEBI constituted a fine or a penalty, leaving it open for consideration in future proceedings. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
