Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
SVLDRS - Rejection of the Petitioner’s Application filed under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - Despite repeated directives from the court, the respondent failed to file a reply affidavit within the stipulated time frame, indicating a lack of compliance. However, the court found that the liability had indeed been quantified before the cutoff date, making the petitioner eligible for the scheme. Interpretation of the SVLDRS scheme and relevant circulars supported this conclusion. As a result, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the rejection of the petitioner's application and directing the department to consider it in accordance with the law.
SVLDRS - Rejection of the Petitioner’s Application filed under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - Despite repeated directives from the court, the respondent failed to file a reply affidavit within the stipulated time frame, indicating a lack of compliance. However, the court found that the liability had indeed been quantified before the cutoff date, making the petitioner eligible for the scheme. Interpretation of the SVLDRS scheme and relevant circulars supported this conclusion. As a result, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the rejection of the petitioner's application and directing the department to consider it in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
