Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
SVLDRS - Rejection of the Petitioner’s Application filed under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - Despite repeated directives from the court, the respondent failed to file a reply affidavit within the stipulated time frame, indicating a lack of compliance. However, the court found that the liability had indeed been quantified before the cutoff date, making the petitioner eligible for the scheme. Interpretation of the SVLDRS scheme and relevant circulars supported this conclusion. As a result, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the rejection of the petitioner's application and directing the department to consider it in accordance with the law.
SVLDRS - Rejection of the Petitioner’s Application filed under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - Despite repeated directives from the court, the respondent failed to file a reply affidavit within the stipulated time frame, indicating a lack of compliance. However, the court found that the liability had indeed been quantified before the cutoff date, making the petitioner eligible for the scheme. Interpretation of the SVLDRS scheme and relevant circulars supported this conclusion. As a result, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the rejection of the petitioner's application and directing the department to consider it in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
