Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Export of service - “intermediary service” or not - service rendered by the appellant to overseas universities/colleges - The Tribunal found that the appellant's services fit the criteria for "export of services." It noted that the appellant's activities were directed towards promoting foreign universities in India and assisting students with admissions, which directly benefited the universities outside India. Since the services were provided to recipients outside India, for which payment was received in convertible foreign exchange, these activities were deemed exports of services. - On examining the definition of "intermediary services," the Tribunal observed that the appellant did not merely arrange or facilitate the provision of services between two or more persons but provided substantial services on their own account to the foreign universities. Thus, it was determined that the appellant's services did not constitute "intermediary services."
Export of service - “intermediary service” or not - service rendered by the appellant to overseas universities/colleges - The Tribunal found that the appellant's services fit the criteria for "export of services." It noted that the appellant's activities were directed towards promoting foreign universities in India and assisting students with admissions, which directly benefited the universities outside India. Since the services were provided to recipients outside India, for which payment was received in convertible foreign exchange, these activities were deemed exports of services. - On examining the definition of "intermediary services," the Tribunal observed that the appellant did not merely arrange or facilitate the provision of services between two or more persons but provided substantial services on their own account to the foreign universities. Thus, it was determined that the appellant's services did not constitute "intermediary services."
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
