Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons to believe - The ITAT thoroughly examined the reasons recorded by the AO for re-opening the assessment and found that there was no new or tangible material available to justify the re-opening. It was established that the AO had already examined and allowed the assessee's claim of deduction under Section 80IB(10) during the original assessment proceedings after due application of mind. The Tribunal concluded that the re-opening of the assessment was solely based on a re-appraisal of the same material available during the original assessment, amounting to a review of the decision taken earlier, which is legally impermissible.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons to believe - The ITAT thoroughly examined the reasons recorded by the AO for re-opening the assessment and found that there was no new or tangible material available to justify the re-opening. It was established that the AO had already examined and allowed the assessee's claim of deduction under Section 80IB(10) during the original assessment proceedings after due application of mind. The Tribunal concluded that the re-opening of the assessment was solely based on a re-appraisal of the same material available during the original assessment, amounting to a review of the decision taken earlier, which is legally impermissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
