Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons to believe - The ITAT thoroughly examined the reasons recorded by the AO for re-opening the assessment and found that there was no new or tangible material available to justify the re-opening. It was established that the AO had already examined and allowed the assessee's claim of deduction under Section 80IB(10) during the original assessment proceedings after due application of mind. The Tribunal concluded that the re-opening of the assessment was solely based on a re-appraisal of the same material available during the original assessment, amounting to a review of the decision taken earlier, which is legally impermissible.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons to believe - The ITAT thoroughly examined the reasons recorded by the AO for re-opening the assessment and found that there was no new or tangible material available to justify the re-opening. It was established that the AO had already examined and allowed the assessee's claim of deduction under Section 80IB(10) during the original assessment proceedings after due application of mind. The Tribunal concluded that the re-opening of the assessment was solely based on a re-appraisal of the same material available during the original assessment, amounting to a review of the decision taken earlier, which is legally impermissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.