Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 27, 2024Case LawsAT
Objection to Resolution Plan submitted - categorization of the Appellant as ‘affected’ homebuyer - The Tribunal upheld the classification of homebuyers into 'affected' and 'unaffected' categories, agreeing with the rationale and justification provided for the different treatment of these groups. It also referenced its previous judgment affirming this classification. - The Tribunal found that the requirement for an NOC from LICHFL was valid and necessary. - The NCLAT noted the overwhelming approval of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC), including the majority of homebuyers, and found no grounds to challenge the Plan's approval.
Objection to Resolution Plan submitted - categorization of the Appellant as ‘affected’ homebuyer - The Tribunal upheld the classification of homebuyers into 'affected' and 'unaffected' categories, agreeing with the rationale and justification provided for the different treatment of these groups. It also referenced its previous judgment affirming this classification. - The Tribunal found that the requirement for an NOC from LICHFL was valid and necessary. - The NCLAT noted the overwhelming approval of the Resolution Plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC), including the majority of homebuyers, and found no grounds to challenge the Plan's approval.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
