Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Recovery of tax dues - Attachment of assets - dues of MVAT Authorities’ have charge in priority to the secured creditors or not - This judgment reaffirms the supremacy of the SARFAESI Act over state tax claims in matters of secured creditors' rights. It clarifies that secured creditors with interests registered prior in time with CERSAI have priority over the proceeds from the sale of secured assets, irrespective of the claims of the MVAT authorities. The judgment highlights the importance of balancing competing interests to ensure that secured assets can be auctioned without undue interference, thereby safeguarding the rights of secured creditors and ensuring the continued economic utility of assets.
Recovery of tax dues - Attachment of assets - dues of MVAT Authorities’ have charge in priority to the secured creditors or not - This judgment reaffirms the supremacy of the SARFAESI Act over state tax claims in matters of secured creditors' rights. It clarifies that secured creditors with interests registered prior in time with CERSAI have priority over the proceeds from the sale of secured assets, irrespective of the claims of the MVAT authorities. The judgment highlights the importance of balancing competing interests to ensure that secured assets can be auctioned without undue interference, thereby safeguarding the rights of secured creditors and ensuring the continued economic utility of assets.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.