Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Recovery of tax dues - Attachment of assets - dues of MVAT Authorities’ have charge in priority to the secured creditors or not - This judgment reaffirms the supremacy of the SARFAESI Act over state tax claims in matters of secured creditors' rights. It clarifies that secured creditors with interests registered prior in time with CERSAI have priority over the proceeds from the sale of secured assets, irrespective of the claims of the MVAT authorities. The judgment highlights the importance of balancing competing interests to ensure that secured assets can be auctioned without undue interference, thereby safeguarding the rights of secured creditors and ensuring the continued economic utility of assets.
Recovery of tax dues - Attachment of assets - dues of MVAT Authorities’ have charge in priority to the secured creditors or not - This judgment reaffirms the supremacy of the SARFAESI Act over state tax claims in matters of secured creditors' rights. It clarifies that secured creditors with interests registered prior in time with CERSAI have priority over the proceeds from the sale of secured assets, irrespective of the claims of the MVAT authorities. The judgment highlights the importance of balancing competing interests to ensure that secured assets can be auctioned without undue interference, thereby safeguarding the rights of secured creditors and ensuring the continued economic utility of assets.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
