Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Disallowance u/s 80P - claim disallowed u/sec. 143(1)(a)(ii) by way of “processing” as an instance of “incorrect claim if such incorrect claim is there from any information in the return” - ITAT noted that this provision was applicable prospectively from April 1, 2021, while the assessment year in question was 2019-2020. Thus, the Tribunal concluded that this provision could not be applied retroactively to disallow the assessee’s deduction claim. - Relying on the principle of stricter interpretation as established in Commissioner vs. Dilip Kumar And Co. & Ors., the Tribunal concluded that the disallowance of the deduction claim by the lower authorities was not justified.
Disallowance u/s 80P - claim disallowed u/sec. 143(1)(a)(ii) by way of “processing” as an instance of “incorrect claim if such incorrect claim is there from any information in the return” - ITAT noted that this provision was applicable prospectively from April 1, 2021, while the assessment year in question was 2019-2020. Thus, the Tribunal concluded that this provision could not be applied retroactively to disallow the assessee’s deduction claim. - Relying on the principle of stricter interpretation as established in Commissioner vs. Dilip Kumar And Co. & Ors., the Tribunal concluded that the disallowance of the deduction claim by the lower authorities was not justified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
