Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
801 to 820 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Nature of loss - Speculative loss or normal business loss - Marked to market loss on hedging of the transaction - The Appellate Tribunal held that speculative transactions are defined as those settled without the actual delivery or transfer of the commodity. The assessee, engaged in the purchase and sale of bullion and manufacturing of gold ornaments, entered into future contracts with suppliers to mitigate potential losses from price fluctuations. The ITAT, after considering precedents and the nature of the assessee's business, concluded that the hedging transactions were essential to its regular business operations and allowed the deduction of the incurred loss u/s 37(1)
Nature of loss - Speculative loss or normal business loss - Marked to market loss on hedging of the transaction - The Appellate Tribunal held that speculative transactions are defined as those settled without the actual delivery or transfer of the commodity. The assessee, engaged in the purchase and sale of bullion and manufacturing of gold ornaments, entered into future contracts with suppliers to mitigate potential losses from price fluctuations. The ITAT, after considering precedents and the nature of the assessee's business, concluded that the hedging transactions were essential to its regular business operations and allowed the deduction of the incurred loss u/s 37(1)
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.