Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim u/s 80C - The Tribunal found that there was a discrepancy in the application of penalties by the lower authorities. - While the Assessing Officer concluded it as a case of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, the subsequent discussion by the National Faceless Appeal Centre deemed it as concealment of taxable income. - Citing a relevant high court decision, the Tribunal deemed this deviation unsustainable in law. - Consequently, the penalty was deemed inappropriate and was deleted.
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim u/s 80C - The Tribunal found that there was a discrepancy in the application of penalties by the lower authorities. - While the Assessing Officer concluded it as a case of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, the subsequent discussion by the National Faceless Appeal Centre deemed it as concealment of taxable income. - Citing a relevant high court decision, the Tribunal deemed this deviation unsustainable in law. - Consequently, the penalty was deemed inappropriate and was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
