Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Recovery of CENVAT Credit erroneously refunded alongwith interest - penalty for ineligible availment of CENVAT Credit - The High Court emphasized that the refund and interest were paid to the petitioner based on these orders, and there was no basis for recovery. - The High Court noted that the Show Cause Notice erroneously mentioned the filing of an SLP, although it was yet to be filed. It held that the Revenue cannot unilaterally declare the refund as erroneous, especially after being unsuccessful in previous legal proceedings. - The High Court acknowledged the Revenue's right to approach the Supreme Court but emphasized that until the Revenue succeeds there or obtains interim orders, the refund cannot be deemed erroneous.
Recovery of CENVAT Credit erroneously refunded alongwith interest - penalty for ineligible availment of CENVAT Credit - The High Court emphasized that the refund and interest were paid to the petitioner based on these orders, and there was no basis for recovery. - The High Court noted that the Show Cause Notice erroneously mentioned the filing of an SLP, although it was yet to be filed. It held that the Revenue cannot unilaterally declare the refund as erroneous, especially after being unsuccessful in previous legal proceedings. - The High Court acknowledged the Revenue's right to approach the Supreme Court but emphasized that until the Revenue succeeds there or obtains interim orders, the refund cannot be deemed erroneous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.