Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Validity of demand of GST including penalty - Violation of principles of natural justice - impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the petitioner and is a cryptic order - Given the shortcomings in the adjudication process, the High Court remitted the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication. The Proper Officer was directed to intimate the petitioner regarding any required details/documents and allow them an opportunity to furnish explanations and additional documents, if necessary.
Validity of demand of GST including penalty - Violation of principles of natural justice - impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the petitioner and is a cryptic order - Given the shortcomings in the adjudication process, the High Court remitted the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication. The Proper Officer was directed to intimate the petitioner regarding any required details/documents and allow them an opportunity to furnish explanations and additional documents, if necessary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.