Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Validity of demand of GST including penalty - Violation of principles of natural justice - impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the petitioner and is a cryptic order - Given the shortcomings in the adjudication process, the High Court remitted the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication. The Proper Officer was directed to intimate the petitioner regarding any required details/documents and allow them an opportunity to furnish explanations and additional documents, if necessary.
Validity of demand of GST including penalty - Violation of principles of natural justice - impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the petitioner and is a cryptic order - Given the shortcomings in the adjudication process, the High Court remitted the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication. The Proper Officer was directed to intimate the petitioner regarding any required details/documents and allow them an opportunity to furnish explanations and additional documents, if necessary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.