Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of demand of GST including penalty - Violation of principles of natural justice - impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the petitioner and is a cryptic order - Given the shortcomings in the adjudication process, the High Court remitted the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication. The Proper Officer was directed to intimate the petitioner regarding any required details/documents and allow them an opportunity to furnish explanations and additional documents, if necessary.
Validity of demand of GST including penalty - Violation of principles of natural justice - impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the petitioner and is a cryptic order - Given the shortcomings in the adjudication process, the High Court remitted the matter to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication. The Proper Officer was directed to intimate the petitioner regarding any required details/documents and allow them an opportunity to furnish explanations and additional documents, if necessary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.