Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Police Custody Petition - creating false GST accounts and claiming irregular Input Tax Credit - conspiracy with the companies with a common intention of misappropriating funds - Despite the prosecution's arguments emphasizing the severity of the offense and the accused's alleged involvement, the magistrate rejected the petition, citing insufficient grounds. The High Court, upon review, upheld the magistrate's decision, noting the absence of strong justification for custodial interrogation. Additionally, the court considered the findings of the DGGI investigation and a committee report, which cast doubt on the need for further police custody. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the criminal revision case.
Police Custody Petition - creating false GST accounts and claiming irregular Input Tax Credit - conspiracy with the companies with a common intention of misappropriating funds - Despite the prosecution's arguments emphasizing the severity of the offense and the accused's alleged involvement, the magistrate rejected the petition, citing insufficient grounds. The High Court, upon review, upheld the magistrate's decision, noting the absence of strong justification for custodial interrogation. Additionally, the court considered the findings of the DGGI investigation and a committee report, which cast doubt on the need for further police custody. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the criminal revision case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
