Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Assessment u/s 153C - inordinate delay in commencement of proceedings - The High court rejected the argument that the proceedings for AYs 2014-15 to 2016-17 were barred by limitation. It clarified that Section 153C, read with Section 153A, allows for assessment or reassessment for six years preceding the search year and for relevant assessment years beyond that, thus encompassing the years in question. - The court found that a consolidated Satisfaction Note suffices the requirements of Section 153C, provided it contains particulars of the incriminating material relevant to the block of AYs. It was determined that the respondents had collated substantial evidence warranting further scrutiny under the Act.
Assessment u/s 153C - inordinate delay in commencement of proceedings - The High court rejected the argument that the proceedings for AYs 2014-15 to 2016-17 were barred by limitation. It clarified that Section 153C, read with Section 153A, allows for assessment or reassessment for six years preceding the search year and for relevant assessment years beyond that, thus encompassing the years in question. - The court found that a consolidated Satisfaction Note suffices the requirements of Section 153C, provided it contains particulars of the incriminating material relevant to the block of AYs. It was determined that the respondents had collated substantial evidence warranting further scrutiny under the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.