Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill - The petitioner argues that the unloading occurred at their own registered godown, with no intent to evade tax. The court underscores the importance of establishing mens rea for penalty imposition, citing precedents. It distinguishes minor errors from major lapses and concludes that the minor typographical error in the e-way bill, coupled with the absence of intent to evade tax, renders the penalty unwarranted.
Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill - The petitioner argues that the unloading occurred at their own registered godown, with no intent to evade tax. The court underscores the importance of establishing mens rea for penalty imposition, citing precedents. It distinguishes minor errors from major lapses and concludes that the minor typographical error in the e-way bill, coupled with the absence of intent to evade tax, renders the penalty unwarranted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.