Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill - The petitioner argues that the unloading occurred at their own registered godown, with no intent to evade tax. The court underscores the importance of establishing mens rea for penalty imposition, citing precedents. It distinguishes minor errors from major lapses and concludes that the minor typographical error in the e-way bill, coupled with the absence of intent to evade tax, renders the penalty unwarranted.
Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill - The petitioner argues that the unloading occurred at their own registered godown, with no intent to evade tax. The court underscores the importance of establishing mens rea for penalty imposition, citing precedents. It distinguishes minor errors from major lapses and concludes that the minor typographical error in the e-way bill, coupled with the absence of intent to evade tax, renders the penalty unwarranted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.