Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Validity of determination of tax under best judgment assessment - The petitioner challenged an ex-parte assessment order arguing that their statutory return in Form GSTR-3B for March 2023 was valid and should take precedence over the assessment order. They also contended that financial constraints prevented timely filing of the return, leading to a best judgment assessment. However, the petitioner failed to avail themselves of the statutory remedy of filing an appeal against the assessment within the prescribed period. The court, citing precedent, concluded that the writ petition was not maintainable due to the petitioner's failure to exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal. As a result, the court dismissed the petition.
Validity of determination of tax under best judgment assessment - The petitioner challenged an ex-parte assessment order arguing that their statutory return in Form GSTR-3B for March 2023 was valid and should take precedence over the assessment order. They also contended that financial constraints prevented timely filing of the return, leading to a best judgment assessment. However, the petitioner failed to avail themselves of the statutory remedy of filing an appeal against the assessment within the prescribed period. The court, citing precedent, concluded that the writ petition was not maintainable due to the petitioner's failure to exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal. As a result, the court dismissed the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
