Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Validity of determination of tax under best judgment assessment - The petitioner challenged an ex-parte assessment order arguing that their statutory return in Form GSTR-3B for March 2023 was valid and should take precedence over the assessment order. They also contended that financial constraints prevented timely filing of the return, leading to a best judgment assessment. However, the petitioner failed to avail themselves of the statutory remedy of filing an appeal against the assessment within the prescribed period. The court, citing precedent, concluded that the writ petition was not maintainable due to the petitioner's failure to exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal. As a result, the court dismissed the petition.
Validity of determination of tax under best judgment assessment - The petitioner challenged an ex-parte assessment order arguing that their statutory return in Form GSTR-3B for March 2023 was valid and should take precedence over the assessment order. They also contended that financial constraints prevented timely filing of the return, leading to a best judgment assessment. However, the petitioner failed to avail themselves of the statutory remedy of filing an appeal against the assessment within the prescribed period. The court, citing precedent, concluded that the writ petition was not maintainable due to the petitioner's failure to exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal. As a result, the court dismissed the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
