Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - The court scrutinized the purported tangible material for reopening, which consisted of audit objections received after the original assessment. However, it noted that the objections had been duly explained by the petitioner during the original assessment proceedings, and the assessing officer had found the explanations satisfactory. Therefore, the court concluded that there was no fresh tangible material justifying the reopening of the assessment.
Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - The court scrutinized the purported tangible material for reopening, which consisted of audit objections received after the original assessment. However, it noted that the objections had been duly explained by the petitioner during the original assessment proceedings, and the assessing officer had found the explanations satisfactory. Therefore, the court concluded that there was no fresh tangible material justifying the reopening of the assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.