Mandatory textile export qualifiers distinguish flame-retardant fabrics from other listed fabrics for automated identification under the textiles ince...
Personal liberty safeguards restrict arrest after court-directed GST appearance, requiring interim release where authorities overreach pending proceed...
Alternative statutory remedy and delay bar GST writ challenges despite pending rectification, while distinct subject matter permits parallel proceedin...
Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application...
Assessing Officer jurisdiction after statutory transfer invalidates reassessment notices issued by transferor officers and nullifies resulting proceed...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction of interest expenditure incurred on borrowed funds u/s 57 - Interest incurred on borrowed funds utilized for making investment in shares in company of Singapore - The ITAT considered the purpose of the investment, emphasizing that the investment was made to earn future income. It referred to a similar case decided by the Calcutta High Court, which held that expenditure on interest could be allowable under Section 57 even if the investment was not solely for earning dividends. The Tribunal concluded that since the investment was made to generate income, the interest expenditure should be allowed as a deduction.
Deduction of interest expenditure incurred on borrowed funds u/s 57 - Interest incurred on borrowed funds utilized for making investment in shares in company of Singapore - The ITAT considered the purpose of the investment, emphasizing that the investment was made to earn future income. It referred to a similar case decided by the Calcutta High Court, which held that expenditure on interest could be allowable under Section 57 even if the investment was not solely for earning dividends. The Tribunal concluded that since the investment was made to generate income, the interest expenditure should be allowed as a deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.