Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Benami transaction - The petitioner argues that the transactions in question occurred before the amendment of the Act in 2016, making the notice and order invalid. They rely on Supreme Court judgments and decisions of appellate tribunals and other High Courts to support their position. - The High Court, however, finds that the show cause notice and provisional attachment order are provisional in nature and subject to judicial review by the adjudicating authority. It declines to entertain the petitions at this stage, emphasizing the availability of statutory alternative remedies.
Benami transaction - The petitioner argues that the transactions in question occurred before the amendment of the Act in 2016, making the notice and order invalid. They rely on Supreme Court judgments and decisions of appellate tribunals and other High Courts to support their position. - The High Court, however, finds that the show cause notice and provisional attachment order are provisional in nature and subject to judicial review by the adjudicating authority. It declines to entertain the petitions at this stage, emphasizing the availability of statutory alternative remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
