Year-wise GST tax periods make composite show cause notices impermissible, requiring separate proceedings despite contrary non-jurisdictional preceden...
Prior APA methodology guides transfer pricing benchmarking where consistent FAR profiles support comparability and arm's length margins eliminate adju...
Page of 4910
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1261 to 1280 of 98195 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CENVAT Credit - input service availed by the appellant at the depot level - The case involved the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for clearing and forwarding services received by the appellant at the depot. The tribunal upheld the appellant's claim, stating that since the ownership of goods remained with them until sold from the depot or consignment agent premises, all input services availed up to that point were eligible for Cenvat Credit. The tribunal interpreted the definition of "place of removal" under the Central Excise Act, 1944, to include the depot of the consignment agent as the place of removal, making services provided up to that point admissible for credit.
CENVAT Credit - input service availed by the appellant at the depot level - The case involved the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for clearing and forwarding services received by the appellant at the depot. The tribunal upheld the appellant's claim, stating that since the ownership of goods remained with them until sold from the depot or consignment agent premises, all input services availed up to that point were eligible for Cenvat Credit. The tribunal interpreted the definition of "place of removal" under the Central Excise Act, 1944, to include the depot of the consignment agent as the place of removal, making services provided up to that point admissible for credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.