Employee recoveries, input tax credit and notice pay recovery under GST: AAR distinguishes taxable supplies from non-taxable perquisites and penalties...
Liberal construction of sufficient cause justifies condonation of inordinate delay where criminal proceedings and jail confinement explained the defau...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5041 to 5060 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CENVAT Credit - input service availed by the appellant at the depot level - The case involved the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for clearing and forwarding services received by the appellant at the depot. The tribunal upheld the appellant's claim, stating that since the ownership of goods remained with them until sold from the depot or consignment agent premises, all input services availed up to that point were eligible for Cenvat Credit. The tribunal interpreted the definition of "place of removal" under the Central Excise Act, 1944, to include the depot of the consignment agent as the place of removal, making services provided up to that point admissible for credit.
CENVAT Credit - input service availed by the appellant at the depot level - The case involved the admissibility of Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for clearing and forwarding services received by the appellant at the depot. The tribunal upheld the appellant's claim, stating that since the ownership of goods remained with them until sold from the depot or consignment agent premises, all input services availed up to that point were eligible for Cenvat Credit. The tribunal interpreted the definition of "place of removal" under the Central Excise Act, 1944, to include the depot of the consignment agent as the place of removal, making services provided up to that point admissible for credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
