Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Reversal/ Refund of the input tax credit - Principles of Estoppel / principle of res judicata - withdrawal of earlier petition - The High court examines the previous withdrawal of the petition and notes that it was unconditional, with no liberty granted to the petitioner. Additionally, the investigation found the petitioner culpable, leading to a show cause notice being issued. - Referring to relevant legal precedents, the court emphasizes the importance of discouraging bench-hunting tactics and upholding public policy to prevent litigants from withdrawing petitions simply to file them before a different bench.
Reversal/ Refund of the input tax credit - Principles of Estoppel / principle of res judicata - withdrawal of earlier petition - The High court examines the previous withdrawal of the petition and notes that it was unconditional, with no liberty granted to the petitioner. Additionally, the investigation found the petitioner culpable, leading to a show cause notice being issued. - Referring to relevant legal precedents, the court emphasizes the importance of discouraging bench-hunting tactics and upholding public policy to prevent litigants from withdrawing petitions simply to file them before a different bench.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
