Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Violation of principles of natural justice - Validity of demand of GST with interest u/s 73 - the Delhi High Court addressed the petitioner's challenge against the order disposing of a Show Cause Notice regarding a tax demand. It found fault with the manner in which the Proper Officer had handled the petitioner's detailed reply, noting a lack of proper consideration and justification for deeming it unsatisfactory. As a result, the court set aside the impugned order and directed the matter to be re-adjudicated, with the Proper Officer instructed to provide the petitioner with an opportunity to clarify and supplement their response.
Violation of principles of natural justice - Validity of demand of GST with interest u/s 73 - the Delhi High Court addressed the petitioner's challenge against the order disposing of a Show Cause Notice regarding a tax demand. It found fault with the manner in which the Proper Officer had handled the petitioner's detailed reply, noting a lack of proper consideration and justification for deeming it unsatisfactory. As a result, the court set aside the impugned order and directed the matter to be re-adjudicated, with the Proper Officer instructed to provide the petitioner with an opportunity to clarify and supplement their response.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
