Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Recovery of service tax - Validity of instruction issued by the department to the Bank - Restriction from permitting any withdrawal from the accounts held by the appellant until the service tax liability is fully satisfied - The Court noted that the appellant did not challenge the tax authority's order imposing taxes through the statutory appeal process, making it final. Therefore, the appellant could not challenge the same order in the writ petition. - Regarding the freezing of the appellant's bank account, the Court observed that the tax authority had the power to issue such notices to enforce tax liabilities. - Considering the appellant's financial condition, the Court granted permission to clear the service tax liability through instalments. The appellant was required to make an initial payment and subsequently pay the balance amount in 24 equal monthly instalments.
Recovery of service tax - Validity of instruction issued by the department to the Bank - Restriction from permitting any withdrawal from the accounts held by the appellant until the service tax liability is fully satisfied - The Court noted that the appellant did not challenge the tax authority's order imposing taxes through the statutory appeal process, making it final. Therefore, the appellant could not challenge the same order in the writ petition. - Regarding the freezing of the appellant's bank account, the Court observed that the tax authority had the power to issue such notices to enforce tax liabilities. - Considering the appellant's financial condition, the Court granted permission to clear the service tax liability through instalments. The appellant was required to make an initial payment and subsequently pay the balance amount in 24 equal monthly instalments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.