Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons to believe - The court examined the reasons recorded for re-assessment provided to the petitioner and compared them with the proforma maintained by the respondent. It noted minor differences in language but found that the substance of the reasons remained consistent. The court emphasized that the material basis for initiating re-assessment was the same in both documents, and minor variations in language did not warrant interference with the proceedings. - The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the validity of the notices issued for re-assessment.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons to believe - The court examined the reasons recorded for re-assessment provided to the petitioner and compared them with the proforma maintained by the respondent. It noted minor differences in language but found that the substance of the reasons remained consistent. The court emphasized that the material basis for initiating re-assessment was the same in both documents, and minor variations in language did not warrant interference with the proceedings. - The writ petition was dismissed, upholding the validity of the notices issued for re-assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.