Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - Application u/s 264 rejected as intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act is not an order amenable to revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - The court ruled that intimation under Section 143(1) is amenable to revisional jurisdiction under Section 264 of the Act. This was based on precedent in "Diwaker Tripathi v. Principal Commissioner of Income tax – 17 & Ors.", which allowed for such revision.
Revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - Application u/s 264 rejected as intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act is not an order amenable to revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - The court ruled that intimation under Section 143(1) is amenable to revisional jurisdiction under Section 264 of the Act. This was based on precedent in "Diwaker Tripathi v. Principal Commissioner of Income tax – 17 & Ors.", which allowed for such revision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
