Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT AO has not examined increase in share capital - The Tribunal noted that the AO had indeed accepted the correct balance sheet filed during the assessment proceedings, and the discrepancies between the original and rectified balance sheets were duly explained by the assessee. Therefore, the assessment order was held to be neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of revenue due to the thorough verification conducted by the AO.
Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT AO has not examined increase in share capital - The Tribunal noted that the AO had indeed accepted the correct balance sheet filed during the assessment proceedings, and the discrepancies between the original and rectified balance sheets were duly explained by the assessee. Therefore, the assessment order was held to be neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of revenue due to the thorough verification conducted by the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
