Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1081 to 1100 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim - order of assessment in appeal not challenged - The Tribunal acknowledged the appellants' arguments regarding the contractual agreement and the price variation clause but emphasized that the refund claims were filed without challenging the assessment of the Bills of Entry. - Citing the decision in ITC Limited vs. Commissioner, the CESTAT held that refund claims cannot be entertained unless the order of assessment or self-assessment is modified in accordance with the law. It clarified that refund proceedings are not meant for reassessment and that the conditions of exemption cannot be adjudicated within the scope of refund provisions.
Refund claim - order of assessment in appeal not challenged - The Tribunal acknowledged the appellants' arguments regarding the contractual agreement and the price variation clause but emphasized that the refund claims were filed without challenging the assessment of the Bills of Entry. - Citing the decision in ITC Limited vs. Commissioner, the CESTAT held that refund claims cannot be entertained unless the order of assessment or self-assessment is modified in accordance with the law. It clarified that refund proceedings are not meant for reassessment and that the conditions of exemption cannot be adjudicated within the scope of refund provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.