Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim - order of assessment in appeal not challenged - The Tribunal acknowledged the appellants' arguments regarding the contractual agreement and the price variation clause but emphasized that the refund claims were filed without challenging the assessment of the Bills of Entry. - Citing the decision in ITC Limited vs. Commissioner, the CESTAT held that refund claims cannot be entertained unless the order of assessment or self-assessment is modified in accordance with the law. It clarified that refund proceedings are not meant for reassessment and that the conditions of exemption cannot be adjudicated within the scope of refund provisions.
Refund claim - order of assessment in appeal not challenged - The Tribunal acknowledged the appellants' arguments regarding the contractual agreement and the price variation clause but emphasized that the refund claims were filed without challenging the assessment of the Bills of Entry. - Citing the decision in ITC Limited vs. Commissioner, the CESTAT held that refund claims cannot be entertained unless the order of assessment or self-assessment is modified in accordance with the law. It clarified that refund proceedings are not meant for reassessment and that the conditions of exemption cannot be adjudicated within the scope of refund provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
