Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
541 to 560 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Seeking winding up of respondent company - Failure to pay outstanding dues - section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 - The court noted the substantial unpaid amount despite demand and found merit in the petitioner's claim for winding up due to the respondent's failure to settle outstanding dues. - Considering the need for liquidation proceedings, the court appointed an Official Liquidator and granted necessary permissions for asset realization and disbursement of dividends. - Upon finding that all assets were realized, creditors were paid, and no further proceedings were feasible, the court ordered the dissolution of the respondent company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Seeking winding up of respondent company - Failure to pay outstanding dues - section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 - The court noted the substantial unpaid amount despite demand and found merit in the petitioner's claim for winding up due to the respondent's failure to settle outstanding dues. - Considering the need for liquidation proceedings, the court appointed an Official Liquidator and granted necessary permissions for asset realization and disbursement of dividends. - Upon finding that all assets were realized, creditors were paid, and no further proceedings were feasible, the court ordered the dissolution of the respondent company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.