Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Seeking winding up of respondent company - Failure to pay outstanding dues - section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 - The court noted the substantial unpaid amount despite demand and found merit in the petitioner's claim for winding up due to the respondent's failure to settle outstanding dues. - Considering the need for liquidation proceedings, the court appointed an Official Liquidator and granted necessary permissions for asset realization and disbursement of dividends. - Upon finding that all assets were realized, creditors were paid, and no further proceedings were feasible, the court ordered the dissolution of the respondent company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Seeking winding up of respondent company - Failure to pay outstanding dues - section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 - The court noted the substantial unpaid amount despite demand and found merit in the petitioner's claim for winding up due to the respondent's failure to settle outstanding dues. - Considering the need for liquidation proceedings, the court appointed an Official Liquidator and granted necessary permissions for asset realization and disbursement of dividends. - Upon finding that all assets were realized, creditors were paid, and no further proceedings were feasible, the court ordered the dissolution of the respondent company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.